Gabriella Hileman
Adalberto Müller – Vilém Flusser Response
Vilém Flusser was born in Prague,
but wrote extensively in German. Moving
to São Paulo after the death of his family in WWII , he even wrote in
Portuguese. Müller, originally from Brazil and ultimately studying both in Sao
Paulo and Germany, felt a personal connection
to Flusser’s writing , as it became quite popular in Brazil before it was well
known elsewhere.
Flusser’s writings were much
overlooked until late in his life in the 1980s, and became more widely known
after his death in the early 1990s. Although his media theory is considered
rather prophetic by many groups today, it’s strange to note that Flusser never
lived to see the development of the world wide web. Indeed, he viewed even men as nodes in a complex
web of interactions, the relationships between them far surpassing the
individual components.
In
Chicago’s flourishing new media and glitch communities, these writings give artists
working in these areas a reference point to build a vocabulary and a dialect to
describe their growing field. These texts function as a link to the past, to a
time when quantization wasn’t so complex and so incredibly large and small.
Flusser’s writings are short and
compact “like a microchip,” says Müller.
They are carefully written and reveal more and more with each careful
reading.
The most relatable idea that I drew
from the lecture is this: the digitalization of the world lies in man’s desire
to control nature with numbers. Based on my interpretation of Müller’s
interpretation of Flusser, the use of languages gave insurmountable power to
those capable of using and understanding the codes. The scientist, engineer and
programmer become a new kind of holy scribe.
Media provides a means to store and
transmit information. The difference between writing and image making is that
lines communicate processes; they project rather than represent. Projecting transcended
representing in that it was capable of evoking entire worlds, rather than just
functioning as a mirror. “
Photography functioned as a new
means of storage and transmission. A photograph always hides a text in its
program. Programs in Flusser’s words are
“the method by which things become.” In order to create work that is
“real,” we must first capture the subject in the program itself. To change the
program is to escape being programmed. The program isn’t just in digitization,
but in all functions of society and bodies. For example, “The Natural History
of the Enigma” by Eduardo Kac a petunia spliced with DNA of the artist
producing bright red bloodlike veins in the flower was an interference with the
code language of genetics.
The process of changing the code
might involve first its fragmentation, then it’s rearrangement, but such
sacrifices must be made, for those who know how to change the code are those
who will not be programmed.
Sources: Flusser, Vilem Writings, Editor Andreas Ströhl, Translation
Erik Eisel, University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis / London, Selections 2002
This is strong, thanks for citing your sources as well. The ending is great--it becomes a call-to-arms for artists and stresses an urgency for understanding the digital paradigm we are implicated in. A-
ReplyDelete